2017-03-21 11:18:14 CET

2017-03-21 11:18:14 CET


REGULATED INFORMATION

English Finnish
Talvivaaran Kaivososakeyhtiö Oyj - Inside information

Talvivaara's Auditor's Report for the financial period 1 January - 31 December 2016


Stock Exchange Release
Talvivaara Mining Company Plc
21 March 2017



 Talvivaara's Auditor's Report for the financial period 1 January - 31 December
                                      2016


The  Auditor's report for the year  ended 31 December 2016 to the Annual General
Meeting of Talvivaara Mining Company Plc is the following:

The  following  document  is  an  English  translation  of the Finnish auditor's
report.


Auditor's Report

To the Annual General Meeting of Talvivaara Mining Company Plc

Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements

Opinion
In our opinion the financial statements give a true and fair view of the group's
and  the parent company's financial position  and financial performance and cash
flows  in accordance with International  Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as
adopted by the EU and comply with statutory requirements.

What we have audited
We  have  audited  the  financial  statements  of  Talvivaara Mining Company Plc
(business  identity code 1847894-2, in Corporate Reorganisation Proceedings) for
the  year ended 31 December 2016. The  financial statements comprise the group's
and  the parent  company's balance  sheet, income  statement, statement  of cash
flows,  statement  of  changes  in  equity  and  notes,  including  a summary of
significant accounting policies.

Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with good auditing practice in Finland. Our
responsibilities  under  good  auditing  practice  are  further described in the
Auditor's  Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of
our report.

We  believe  that  the  audit  evidence  we  have  obtained  is  sufficient  and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence
We  are  independent  of  the  parent  company  and  of  the  group companies in
accordance  with the ethical requirements that are applicable in Finland and are
relevant  to our audit, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities
in accordance with these requirements.

Emphasis of Matter
We  draw attention  to note  2 in the  financial statements, which describes the
basis  of preparation of the financial  statements on a non-going concern basis,
as  well as the  uncertainties relating to  the Company's ability  to revise its
reporting basis and to regain its status as a going concern and to note 6, which
illustrates  the  parent  company's  adjusted  equity  and  liabilities  if  the
restructuring programme is confirmed. Our opinion is not qualified in respect of
this matter.


Our Audit Approach

Overview

                      Materiality
  * Overall group materiality is € 0.1 million, which represents 1 % of other
    operating income


Group scoping
  * Group audit scope includes the parent company


Key audit matters
  * Key audit matter:

      * - Cash flow forecasting process


As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks
of  material  misstatement  in  the  financial  statements.  In  particular,  we
considered  where management made subjective judgements; for example, in respect
of  significant  accounting  estimates  that  involved  making  assumptions  and
considering future events that are inherently uncertain.

Materiality
The  scope of  our audit  was influenced  by our  application of materiality. An
audit   is  designed  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  whether  the  financial
statements  are free from material misstatement.  Misstatements may arise due to
fraud  or error. They  are considered material  if individually or in aggregate,
they  could reasonably be expected to  influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of the financial statements.

Based   on  our  professional  judgement,  we  determined  certain  quantitative
thresholds  for  materiality,  including  the  overall group materiality for the
consolidated financial statements as set out in the table below. These, together
with  qualitative considerations, helped us to  determine the scope of our audit
and  the nature, timing and  extent of our audit  procedures and to evaluate the
effect of misstatements on the financial statements as a whole.
+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
|Overall group materiality             |€ 0.1 million                          |
+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
|How we determined it                  |1 % of other operating income          |
+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
|Rationale    for    the    materiality|We  chose other operating income as the|
|benchmark applied                     |benchmark  because, in our view, in the|
|                                      |absence  of business  operations and in|
|                                      |the  circumstances  of  the  group,  it|
|                                      |represents  relevant way to measure the|
|                                      |performance  of the group. We chose 1% |
|                                      |which is within the range of acceptable|
|                                      |quantitative  materiality thresholds in|
|                                      |auditing standards.                    |
+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+



How we tailored our group audit scope
We  tailored the scope of  our audit, taking into  account the circumstances and
operations of the group.

Key Audit Matters
Key  audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of
most  significance  in  our  audit  of  the  financial statements of the current
period.  These  matters  were  addressed  in  the  context  of  our audit of the
financial  statements as a whole, and in  forming our opinion thereon, and we do
not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

As  in all of our  audits, we also addressed  the risk of management override of
internal  controls, including among other matters consideration of whether there
was  evidence of bias  that represented a  risk of material  misstatement due to
fraud.



+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
|Key  audit matter in  the audit of the|How  our audit addressed  the key audit|
|group and the parent company          |matter                                 |
|                                      |                                       |
+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
|Cash flow forecasting process         |We   reviewed  management's  cash  flow|
|                                      |forecasting  process and tested the key|
|Refer   to   the   balance  sheet  and|assumptions as follows:                |
|statement of cash flows               |                                       |
|                                      |*  We made inquiries with management on|
|As  at  31 December  2016, the group's|their    intention   of   funding   and|
|cash  and cash equivalents amounted to|financing new businesses.              |
|€ 3.8 million. The parent company does|                                       |
|not    currently   have   any   income|* We analysed management's monthly cash|
|generating  business and  is financing|flow  forecasts and  compared them with|
|its operations from its cash reserves.|the actuals.                           |
|If  the  necessary  cash  flow  is not|                                       |
|secured,  the parent  company may have|*  We  tested  mathematical accuracy of|
|to file for bankruptcy.               |the monthly cash flow forecasts.       |
|                                      |                                       |
|Our  audit  procedures  focused on the|                                       |
|cash   flow  forecasting  process,  as|                                       |
|accurate and timely cash forecasts are|                                       |
|vital to the group's future.          |                                       |
+--------------------------------------+---------------------------------------+



Responsibilities  of the  Board of  Directors and  the Managing Director for the
Financial
Statements
The  Board  of  Directors  and  the  Managing  Director  are responsible for the
preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and
comply  with statutory  requirements. The  Board of  Directors and  the Managing
Director  are also  responsible for  such internal  control as they determine is
necessary  to enable the preparation of  financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In  preparing the financial statements, the  Board of Directors and the Managing
Director  are responsible  for assessing  the parent  company's and  the group's
ability  to  continue  as  going  concern,  disclosing,  as  applicable, matters
relating  to going concern and using the  going concern basis of accounting. The
financial  statements are prepared  using the going  concern basis of accounting
unless  there is an  intention to liquidate  the parent company  or the group or
cease  operations, or there is  no realistic alternative but  to do so. When the
financial  statements are not prepared on a going concern basis, that fact shall
be  disclosed in the financial statements, together  with the basis on which the
financial  statements have been  prepared and the  reason why the  entity is not
regarded as going concern.

Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our  objectives  are  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance on whether the financial
statements  as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance  is a high  level of assurance,  but is not  a guarantee that an audit
conducted  in  accordance  with  good  auditing  practice  will  always detect a
material misstatement when it exists.

Misstatements  can arise  from fraud  or error  and are  considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence
the  economic  decisions  of  users  taken  on  the  basis  of  these  financial
statements.

As  part  of  an  audit  in  accordance  good  auditing  practice,  we  exercise
professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
We also:

  * Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
    statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit
    procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is
    sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of
    not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than
    for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
    intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal
    control.
  * Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order
    to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
    not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
    parent company's or the group's internal control.
  * Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
    reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made by
    management.
  * Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors' and the Managing
    Director's use of the basis of accounting on which the financial statements
    have been prepared.
  * Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial
    statements, including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements
    represent the underlying transactions and events so that the financial
    statements give a true and fair view.
  * Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial
    information of the entities or business activities within the group to
    express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are
    responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the group
    audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion.

We  communicate  with  those  charged  with  governance  regarding,  among other
matters,  the  planned  scope  and  timing  of  the  audit and significant audit
findings,  including any  significant deficiencies  in internal  control that we
identify during our audit.

We  also provide  those charged  with governance  with a  statement that we have
complied  with  relevant  ethical  requirements  regarding  independence, and to
communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be
thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

From  the matters communicated with those  charged with governance, we determine
those  matters that  were of  most significance  in the  audit of  the financial
statements  of the current  period and are  therefore the key  audit matters. We
describe  these  matters  in  our  auditor's  report  unless  law  or regulation
precludes  public  disclosure  about  the  matter  or  when,  in  extremely rare
circumstances,  we determine  that a  matter should  not be  communicated in our
report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected
to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication.

Other Reporting Requirements

Other Information
The  Board of Directors and the Managing  Director are responsible for the other
information.  The other information comprises information included in the report
of the Board of Directors.

Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information.

In  connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is
to read the information included in the report of the Board of Directors and, in
doing  so, consider whether the information included  in the report of the Board
of  Directors is  materially inconsistent  with the  financial statements or our
knowledge  obtained  in  the  audit,  or  otherwise  appears  to  be  materially
misstated.  Our responsibility also  includes considering whether  the report of
the  Board of Directors has been prepared in accordance with the applicable laws
and regulations.

In  our opinion,  the information  in the  report of  the Board  of Directors is
consistent  with the information in the  information in the financial statements
and  the report of the  Board of Directors has  been prepared in accordance with
the applicable laws and regulations.

If,  based on the work  we have performed, we  conclude that there is a material
misstatement  of  the  information  included  in  the  report  of  the  Board of
Directors,  we are required  to report that  fact. We have  nothing to report in
this regard.

Other Matter
We  also draw attention to the disclosure "Risk management and key risks" in the
report of the Board of Directors, which describes the parent company's near term
risk factors that relate to the continuance of the business operations.

Helsinki 21 March 2017

PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy
Authorised Public Accountants


Juha Wahlroos
Authorised Public Accountant (KHT)


Enquiries
Talvivaara Mining Company Plc Tel +358 20 712 9800
Pekka Perä, CEO
Pekka Erkinheimo, Deputy CEO


[]